Faculty and Academic Staff Handbook
19th Edition, 2008
Chapter IV: Faculty Personnel Rules and Procedures of UW-River Falls
4.5 Periodic Review-Faculty Personnel Rules
4.5.1 Post-tenure Review of Professional Activities of Faculty
At least once every five years the professional activities of tenured faculty will be
reviewed to inform each faculty member of his or her performance. The review may be
conducted simultaneously with merit review or with promotion review.
For the purpose of this review the criteria used are those found in the Faculty/Academic
Staff Handbook under Section 4.3.2.1c and the appropriate department's statement
applying these criteria to the department mission, such statement to be on file in the
Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs' office.
4.5.2 Conducting the Review
The academic unit will determine whether a committee of its tenured faculty or the chair
will conduct the review. The reviewer(s) shall:
- Review the teaching portfolio, the personal reflective statement (see Section 4.3.2.3 above) and other pertinent data submitted by the faculty member. The faculty member
has primary responsibility for assembling the data for review. The faculty member will
include an inventory of the data submitted, and the chair will verify the inventory
contents. The faculty member is responsible for promptly submitting the information for
his or her review. The reviewer(s) will prepare a summary of their findings.
- Discuss with the faculty member his or her performance in continuing to meet the
criteria under Section 4.3.2.1c Following this discussion the reviewer(s) will prepare a
final summary of findings and recommendations which will be signed by the chair and
any other reviewers, and by the faculty member reviewed to acknowledge that the review
was completed.
- Enter into the faculty member's departmental professional file the inventory, the final
summary report, and any other pertinent information used in the review. The faculty
member reviewed will be given a copy of the final summary report.
If the faculty member's performance is deemed outstanding, a copy of the report shall be
entered into the peer merit file as evidence to support a high merit ranking, and the chair
shall consider the faculty member in the recommendations to the Dean for special merit
awards.
If the faculty member's review reveals a need for significant improvement in
performance, the chair will report such to the academic Dean. The Dean and the chair, in
consultation with the faculty member, will recommend a retraining or redevelopment
program to the Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, who shall assist the
Dean to find resources to fund such a program. This program may include, but is not limited to, additional coursework, referral to the Employee Assistance Program,
participation in professional meetings in the discipline, and/or appointment of a peer
mentor.
4.5.3 Challenging the Review
The faculty member may challenge the summary report before the reviewer(s) and/or
before the tenured faculty of his or her department. Subsequently, the faculty member
may take the matter to the University Faculty Hearing, Grievance, and Appeals
Committee.
4.5.3.1 Procedures: Post-tenure Review Timeline
- Names of faculty members subject to post-tenure review forwarded to heads of
academic units no later than May 1 of the academic year preceding review
- Head of academic unit notifies faculty member no later than May 15 of the academic
year preceding review
- Department sets post-tenure review dates and decides whether post-tenure review will
be conducted by the chair or by committee no later than September 30
- Selection of committee, if necessary, completed by October 15
- Head of academic unit notifies faculty member and post-tenure review committee (if
committee option is in effect) of review dates by October 30
- Faculty member compiles portfolio and other pertinent data of previous five years'
contributions no later than January 30
- Chair or committee reviews portfolio during one-©week review period between
January 30 and April 15 (Post-tenure review dates set by department no later than
September 30 - see (c) above.)
- Chair or committee meets with faculty member to discuss performance. Following this
meeting, final summary of findings and recommendations is prepared and signed, with
faculty member receiving copy of post-tenure review report no later than two weeks after
post-tenure review period. (Post-tenure review dates set by department no later than
September 30 - see (c) above.)
- Post-tenure review report is forwarded to Dean by one week after meeting with faculty
member.
- Dean forwards post-tenure review report and any response to the Provost and Vice
Chancellor for Academic Affairs by one week after post-tenure review report forwarded
to Dean.
4.5.3.2 Table: Post-tenure Review Calendar
Action |
Date |
Names forwarded to heads of academic units |
By May 1 of the academic year preceding review |
Head of academic unit notifies faculty member |
By May 15 of the academic year preceding review |
Department sets post-tenure review dates and method |
By September 30 |
Selection of committee, if necessary |
By October 15 |
Head of academic unit notifies faculty member and committee of review dates |
By October 30 |
Faculty member completes portfolio |
By January 30 |
Chair or committee reviews portfolio |
One-week review period between January 30 and April 15 |
Chair or committee member meets with faculty member and final summary is submitted to faculty member |
No later than two weeks after the post-tenure review period |
Post-tenure review report forwarded to Dean |
By one week after meeting with faculty member |
Dean forwards report and any response to the Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs |
By one week after post-tenure review report is forwarded to Dean |
If significant improvement in performance is needed, the faculty member, the chair, the
Dean and the Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs confer to draft an
appropriate retraining or development program. Resources should not be removed from
existing faculty development programs for programs to remedy deficiencies.
4.5.4 Professional Record Procedures
A folder containing the personal resumé of each staff member with certified transcripts,
academic record, experience, and professional accomplishments is kept in the Human
Resources Office. It is the responsibility of all faculty members to see that the record is
kept up to date. See the section on Promotion Criteria 4.4.4.5.3 earlier in this section for a
listing of items which should be in the professional record. This record is confidential and
will be released only as deemed appropriate under state and federal statutes.
4.5.5 Student Evaluation of Instruction
4.5.5.1 Introduction
In general, student evaluation of classroom teaching produces two types of information.
One type of information can be used to help the faculty and instructional academic staff
identify the effectiveness of specific instructional practices and can also identify areas for
improvement or development. The second type of information gained from uniform
student evaluations is used to arrive at broad comparisons of faculty and instructional
academic staff members and can be used for personnel decisions.
The student survey of classroom teaching effectiveness conducted at UWRF is of the
second type only. According to an interpretation by the Wisconsin Attorney General, the
results of uniform student evaluations conducted by the University, College, or unit on a
required basis are PUBLIC information.
- All of the following courses with enrollment greater than 1 will be evaluated by
students: [FS 06/07 #32]
a. all on campus and off campus offerings
b. all offerings from face-to-face to completely on-line
i. lecture
ii. laboratory
iii. discussions
iv. seminars
c. when lecture/lab/discussion combinations, consider
i. if same faculty/students groupings, faculty decision to give it to only
one or each offering – all students must be given the opportunity to
evaluate
ii. if different faculty/students groupings, evaluations will be required for
all offerings
- All other types of courses will not be evaluated unless the department so chooses [FS 06/07 #32]
Student evaluations are but one means of assessing classroom teaching effectiveness. A
thorough review of teaching effectiveness includes classroom observations by peers; a
review of syllabi, tests, texts, and required readings; a review of other teaching tools such
as computer simulations and videos; videos of a class period; self-evaluation including
statements of teaching goals, and the methods the teacher uses to accomplish these goals;
examples of the products of one's teaching such as essays, papers, art and performances;
examination of grading patterns and how grades are determined in a department; and the
results of uniform student evaluations. The information used in assessing teaching
effectiveness for personnel decisions should augment the information required in Section
4.3.2.1 c.1 and 4.3.2.3.
In brief, uniform student evaluations should be used as supporting evidence of classroom
teaching effectiveness and not as the primary evidence of it.
4.5.5.2 Uses of the Uniform Survey Results
The results of uniform evaluations of classroom teaching effectiveness can be used in
personnel decisions. Personnel decisions are made in departments/units, by the Deans, by
the Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs, by the Chancellor, by College
promotion committees, and by those involved in grievance proceedings. Normally the
personnel decisions made are for retention, promotion, tenure, and merit pay.
Every academic and administrative unit making personnel decisions must state in writing
the relative importance of student evaluations in comparison to other means of evaluating
teaching such as those discussed above. The statements must be approved by the
appropriate Dean, the Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs and by the
Chancellor.
4.5.5.3 Uniform Survey Instrument
- The survey instrument will include only questions approved by the Faculty Senate,
and will be administered by the Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs.
- Any statistical measures will be applied to the results of one question only, not to any
combination of all the questions. Statistical measures applied to a question must be
limited to the responses to that question in one class section only. There must not be any
"composite" number derived from the results of the questions.
- The frequency, standard deviation, mean or average of the results of each question
must not be used explicitly to compute any department, College, or University-wide
salary change including raises, merit pay or pay reductions.
- The results of uniform student evaluations will be sent to the individual faculty
member surveyed, to the department chair, to the Dean, to the Provost and Vice
Chancellor for Academic Affairs, and will be available in the Library.
- Uniform student evaluations will be conducted within the last three weeks of the
semester. Fall semester evaluation(s) shall be conducted in a timely manner so that results
for probationary faculty will be available by January 10th.The results of the survey will
not be available until after the final grade rosters are submitted to the Registrar. The
Provost and Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs will ensure that all grade rosters have
been submitted.
- Uniform student evaluations will be administered in all classes each semester for
probationary faculty and instructional academic staff only, and evaluations will be
administered each semester for one-third of tenured faculty. Tenured faculty to be
evaluated will be selected alphabetically every third evaluation period. Faculty have the
option to have evaluations done more frequently.
4.5.5.4 Recommendation for Further Evaluation
Individual faculty members may on their own volition conduct additional student surveys
to help identify the effectiveness of specific instructional practices and areas for
improvement or development. Individual students may decide whether to complete these
surveys or not. The results of the surveys are confidential and are the property of the
individual faculty member. At the discretion of the faculty member, a copy of the survey
instrument, and any results obtained from them, may be included in the personnel file as
a part of the teaching portfolio.